Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Q110.

...

If

...

two

...

entities

...

share

...

a

...

Title

...

V

...

permit

...

would

...

that

...

preclude

...

them

...

from

...

reporting

...

separately

...

even

...

if

...

there

...

is

...

no

...

common

...

ownership

...

or

...

control?

...

A110. EPA has determined that the Title V definition of facility is not appropriate for this GHG reporting rule.  The GHG rule serves a different purpose than Title V programs and therefore defines a facility in a way that is more inclusive of all large emitters.  Under the facility definition in the GHG rule, if there is no common ownership or common control, then the facilities would be separate and their emissions would be reported separately. Wiki Markup{show-to:group=confluence-Users}{center}{_}Footer / References Bar which is Visible to the public{_}{center}{show-to}


Show If
special@authenticated
Footer / References Bar which is Visible to the public
Panel

Updated on

Page info
infoTypemodified-Modified date
typemodified-dateFlat
dateformatdd/MM/YY HH:mm

...

Show If
special@authenticated
Info

Source: This question and answer was derived from a Legacy FAQ.

Approval / Publishing History: Version 1

Expiration : None

Relevant Subparts: Subpart A


History Panel For Internal Use - Not Visible to the Public

...

This web site is maintained by a contractor to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (RY2021.R.02)